PRESS RELEASE
THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE
ON GRAZING RESERVES AND HERDERS FARMERS CONFLICTS
After
writing to congratulate the members of the committee set up to provide a
roadmap by harmonizing the various position papers on the resolution of the
herdsmen-farmers conflict and raising objection to the effort of the government
to favour the Fulani against farmers who are victims of their attacks.
The
Conference of Autochthonous Ethnic Nationalities Community Development
Associations (CONAECDA) a network of over 300 minority ethnic nationalities
community development associations representing over 300 minority ethnic groups
in Northern states of Nigeria is really dismayed at the report of the
committee.
We are however not surprised by the report
because the work of the committee was cut out for it as stated by the Permanent
secretary ministry of Agriculture as posted on its web site and we quote. “The Permanent Secretary in the
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Sonny Echono, had explained that
President Muhammadu Buhari has directed the Ministry to consider the
recommendations of studies commissioned by the Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF) and
the Northern Governors Forum (NGF) on the same subject with a view to
developing pragmatic strategic action plan for the development of grazing
reserves and stock routes nationwide.”
To
those who may not remember President Muhammadu Buhari was the PTF Chairman and
out of the 19 Governors of Northern Nigeria more than 50% were of Hausa Fulani
Background.
Our
People are victims of the unprovoked attacks by Fulani herdsmen against our
farming communities in northern Nigeria. We make bold to say that Fulani are
not the only herdsmen in, however the assignment of the committee has been
reduced to an ethnic assignment where the Fulani herdsmen are designated as one
of two parties to the conflict.
We
make bold to say that the herdsmen-farmers’ conflicts are not an agricultural
conflict, but an expression of deep-seated ethnic, cultural, religious,
economic and political interests, differences, crises and crimes. We also want
to state that the committee is nothing but a group of individuals mandated to
give the Fulani what they are demanding for without recognizing the fears and
aspirations of hundreds of communities of famers (who are both crop and animal
producers) and the implementation of the recommendation of the committee will
lead to nothing but plunge this country into an intractable crisis.
We
believe the solution to the herdsmen-farmers’ conflict lies in the resolution
of the National Conference 2014, which is a national consensus based on the
best available and concrete information and understanding flowing from a
nationally negotiated agreement, and cannot be superseded by the views of a few
experts.
As a
reminder we list the key points of the resolutions bellow, the details of which
are available in the 2014 National Conference Report:
1.
Phase out cattle routes and grazing reserves
in the long term to lay emphasis on ranching.
2. Bring
cattle rustling under control by better policing because it is a disincentive
to ranching.
3. In
the meantime, States which have large livestock populations should endeavour to
maintain grazing reserves.
4. The
traditional institutions should be primarily responsible for the Conflict
Resolution between the Herdsmen and Farmers, and also their respective
Associations.
5.
Where resolutions failed, then the
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Centre should be their last resort.
Our
communities are concerned that a President of Fulani extraction is determined
to forcefully and otherwise take over the lands of other communities and give
them to people of his ethnic group in the name of grazing reserves and cattle
routes.
These
fears as expressed by our communities, and they demand that we make it clear to
all Nigerians and the international community; that our communities have
resolved not to give out land for the creation of Fulani territories in the
name of grazing reserves, but will in the spirit of national brotherhood
provide land for ranching on clearly stipulated conditions by our communities, to
anyone irrespective of his ethnic background. If however, the economic, political
and cultural agenda of the Fulani ethnic group is executed without due
reference to the fears and aspirations of the hundreds of other ethnic groups
(the so called farmers), we will want to put it on record that no Traditional
Ruler or community leader or group can control the various and diverse reactions
that these move will trigger. Let it never be said that the President was not
given the benefit of the strong views of the over 300 ethnic groups whose lands
are the target of forceful occupation by the Fulani ethnic group.
We
write this letter with the highest sense of responsibility, hoping that the
President will bring us peace and not more bloodshed.
We
pray that God Almighty will grand the Leaders of this Nation wisdom in
resolving these issues. We assure Nigerians of our commitment to peaceful
resolution of the issues but not at all costs.
Long
live CONAECDA
Long
live The Federal Republic of Nigeria
Suleman
S. Sukukum
Comments
Post a Comment